In Squish La Fish V

Multiple Choice

In Squish La Fish v. Thomco Specialty Products, involving an adhesive that did not work as hoped in product packaging, Squish La Fish sued the adhesive seller for negligent misrepresentation because:

A) Squish La Fish could not use the adhesive because it was toxic
B) Thomco raised the price of the adhesive after Squish La Fish agreed to buy it
C) Squish La Fish felt that it relied on Thomco's false information about the adhesive and suffered economic losses as a result
D) all of the specific choices
E) none of the specific choices