In Chambers V

Multiple Choice

In Chambers v. Travelers Companies, where Chambers sued for defamation after she was fired for her behavior, which included failure to reveal certain information about a business trip, but the district court held for Travelers, the appeals court found that:

A) Chambers did not have a case because the information was true
B) Chambers did not have a case because Travelers had a qualified privilege that it did not abuse
C) Chambers did not have a case because she had previously offended the CEO of Travelers by "insubordinate communication"
D) all of the other specific choices are correct
E) none of the other specific choices