In Neilsen V

Multiple Choice

In Neilsen v. Gold's Gym, where Gold's leased space for a new gym, but got into a dispute with the landlord of a the commercial space before it even moved in, the courts held that:

A) the lease was valid; Gold's was liable for damages for breach
B) the lease was valid but the landlord breached by failing to finish the building properly
C) the lease was invalid because several key provisions conflicted with state law regarding proper construction
D) there was no lease because the terms were unclear
E) none of the other choices