In Wal-Mart V

Multiple Choice

In Wal-Mart v. Samara Brothers, where Wal-Mart was accused of copying the design of children's clothing, the Supreme Court held that for trade dress protection to exist, the good or service must:

A) be registered with the Trademark office
B) be "original"
C) have secondary meaning
D) all of the other specific choices
E) none of the other choices