Multiple Choice
Jin worked on technical developments for Motorola. One year she took a leave of absence to return to her home country, China, to work for a year. After returning to Motorola, she downloaded thousands of documents, many of which involved trade secrets. She bought a one-way ticket to China and was arrested at the airport when she was about to go to China with the documents. She was convicted of theft and sentenced to four years in prison. The court of appeals held that she was:
A) improperly convicted as there was no evidence that the secrets had commercial value.
B) improperly convicted as she had the right to access such materials as a Motorola employee and had not delivered them to anyone else.
C) improperly convicted because she had no knowledge that the information had national security implications.
D) properly convicted.
E) none of the other choices are correct.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q381: Which of the following is a drawback
Q382: Something that is in the public domain:<br>A)
Q383: If an invention was known or used
Q384: To register a trademark you have to
Q385: The Economic Espionage Act applies to the
Q387: Suggestive trademarks are provided no legal protection.
Q388: The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has
Q389: Cybersquatters who claim domain names that include
Q390: Many historians believe that the U.S. system
Q391: In Bowman v. Monsanto, where Bowman used