Multiple Choice
Jin worked on technical developments for Motorola. One year she took a leave of absence to return to her home country, China, to work for a year. After returning to Motorola, she downloaded thousands of documents, many of which involved trade secrets. She bought a one-way ticket to China and was arrested at the airport when she was about to go to China with the documents. She was convicted of theft and sentenced to four years in prison. The court of appeals held that she was:
A) improperly convicted as there was no evidence that the secrets had commercial value.
B) improperly convicted as she had the right to access such materials as a Motorola employee and had not delivered them to anyone else.
C) improperly convicted because she had no knowledge that the information had national security implications.
D) improperly convicted of trade secret theft but properly convicted of economic espionage for a foreign country.
E) none of the other choices are correct.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q51: In Bowman v. Monsanto, where Bowman used
Q52: Counterfeit or fake goods do not create
Q53: "Raisin Bran" is not a trademark because
Q54: If a company registers its trademark under
Q55: A patent registered with the World Intellectual
Q57: As long as the owner continues to
Q58: In Audi AG v. D'Amato, where Audi
Q59: Intellectual property is also called intangible property.
Q60: An example of a generic trademark is:<br>A)
Q61: "Exxon" is an arbitrary and fanciful trademark.