Multiple Choice
Suess signed a contract which included a covenant not to compete with his employer for a year if he left the firm. When Suess quit, he went into competition with his former employer and was sued. He argued that the covenant was not valid. The court held:
A) Suess was right, such covenants are void under federal law
B) in all states, such covenants violate public policy
C) such covenant are unconscionable in all states
D) the covenant is probably valid in states that allow them
E) the covenant was not backed up by consideration, so there was no contract to be violated
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q507: A contract formed by performance of actions
Q508: The party claiming incapacity, or the lack
Q509: If a house burns down before it
Q510: Which of the following is not a
Q511: Termination of the offer can occur through
Q513: A novation occurs when a third party
Q514: Fraud occurs when there is false material
Q515: To allow recovery and avoid injustice when
Q516: A counteroffer _ the original offer.<br>A) completes<br>B)
Q517: A minor is someone who:<br>A) is under