Multiple Choice
Clark, a movie producer, was allowed to work at a movie production company's offices (ITC) out of courtesy. His business card listed the ITC address and his phone calls were handled by ITC staff. In the office, he made a deal to produce a movie for another company. When problems developed and the company, presuming Clark worked for ITC, sued ITC. The court would be likely to hold that ITC:
A) ratified Clark's actions and so became liable for his actions
B) expressly accepted contracts negotiated by Clark, so was liable for the failure to perform
C) had no liability because Clark merely was allowed to use office space at ITC
D) had no liability because Clark had no authority to represent ITC in movie decisions
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q237: Anderson was in Las Vegas for an
Q238: _ is when an agency is created
Q239: The legal document intended for the purpose
Q240: The duty of an agent to perform
Q241: In Guz v. Bechtel National, where Guz
Q243: Power of attorney:<br>A) is a document that
Q244: Apparent authority arises when:<br>A) the principal creates
Q245: In France v. Southern Equipment, where a
Q246: When you go on vacation you give
Q247: The authority given by the principal to