Multiple Choice
Carter, who had been convicted of violent crimes, was hired as an independent contractor to sell vacuum cleaners door-to-door. He assaulted a customer in her home who sued the vacuum cleaner company. You would expect the Texas high court to hold that company:
A) was liable for negligence in hiring
B) was not liable because employers are not liable for acts of independent contractors
C) was not liable because Carter's actions were in violation of his instructions
D) was not liable because it had no control over Carter's actions when he was selling
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q369: Terry hires an agent, Janet, to sell
Q370: Gratuitous agents are appointed by other agents
Q371: In Town Center Shopping Center v. Premier
Q372: Power of attorney:<br>A) is a document that
Q373: The law of agency places its primary
Q375: Many companies give employees handbooks that discuss
Q376: According to the California supreme court in
Q377: In Cove Management v. AFLAC, Galgano, an
Q378: Because of the _ an agent may
Q379: An employment of an agent for the