Multiple Choice
Which of the following statements about the per se rule and the rule of reason antitrust doctrines is true?
A) under rule of reason, only proof of an antitrust violation is needed for the courts to rule the firm violates antitrust laws
B) under per se, the court rules that the actions of the firm are not justified given the weight of the evidence
C) under rule of reason, the court rules that any violation of antitrust legislation is illegal
D) under per se, if precedent found a business action to be illegal it always remains illegal
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q167: The Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act requires:<br>A) firms
Q168: Large retailers such as Wal-Mart are most
Q169: There is no exact definition of a
Q170: Treble damages may only be collected by
Q171: The word "antitrust" in the Sherman Antitrust
Q173: In 1911, with regard to resale price
Q174: Antitrust suits may be brought by the
Q175: Antitrust law restricting monopolization favors competition because:<br>A)
Q176: The original reason for the Robinson-Patman Act
Q177: If Coca-Cola were to want to merge