Multiple Choice
Which of the following statements about the per se rule and the rule of reason antitrust doctrines is true?
A) under rule of reason, only proof of an antitrust violation is needed for the courts to rule the firm violates antitrust laws
B) under per se, the court rule that a certain business practice being committed is automatically illegal
C) under rule of reason, the court consider the impact of a business practice to determine if it is harmful to competition
D) under per se, if precedent found a business action to be illegal, it always remains illegal
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q268: The Supreme Court holds that where monopoly
Q269: When two firms merge, they must notify
Q270: Violators of the Sherman Act face the
Q271: The general understanding of Leegin Creative Leather
Q272: If two firms that were previously in
Q274: Coca-Cola's limitation on where a bottler is
Q275: Price discrimination was made unlawful by:<br>A) the
Q276: In Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS,
Q277: Violations of the Sherman Act can result
Q278: To win a case involving predatory pricing