In Leegin Creative Leather Products V

Multiple Choice

In Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, a maker of leather goods would not sell to stores that would not follow its pricing policy (resale price maintenance) . The Supreme Court held that:

A) all vertical price fixing subject to a rule of reason
B) vertical price fixing of maximum retail prices was illegal
C) vertical price fixing may injure the ability of sellers to compete so is generally illegal
D) vertical price fixing may cause dealers to be able to furnish more services in an anticompetitive manner
E) none of the other choices