Multiple Choice
Fact Pattern 20-1
MicroManage is the fastest growing home-software producer in the country. In 2000, it sold 6% of all home software in the U.S., but in 2011, it sold 55% of all home software. A recent issue of Computer Universe said that MicroManage was "the most dominant and aggressive of all home-software developers." Home software is a small part of the entire software industry.
In 2011, MicroManage proposed a merger with Game Master, its main rival. Game Master was responsible for 10% of all home-software sales in 2010. MicroManage's president says that the combination of the firms will allow MicroManage to lower costs and pass the savings on to its customers.
The Department of Justice filed suit to stop this merger, claiming the combination would give monopoly power to the merged firm. Justice insists that consumers would lose in the end.
-Refer to Fact Pattern 20-1. MicroManage executives decide that if they are not allowed to merge with Game Master, MicroManage will propose to GameMaster and other home-software producers that they allocate customers on a geographic basis. Such an agreement:
A) would be legal under the Parker doctrine
B) would be an illegal horizontal market sharing device
C) would be a legal horizontal marketing device because it does not control prices
D) would probably be unenforceable under the rule in Leegin Leather
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q366: A hospital requires that patients use the
Q367: The Sherman Act expressly holds illegal:<br>A) contracts
Q368: The first antitrust statute enacted by Congress
Q369: In Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical
Q370: A private party who sues another party
Q372: A tying arrangement occurs when:<br>A) a distributor
Q373: A horizontal restraint of trade is likely
Q374: Which antitrust statute carries the most severe
Q375: Producers of quality brand-name products often favor
Q376: Because the antitrust statutes are unclear about