Which of the Following Cases Held That There Is No

Multiple Choice

Which of the following cases held that there is no conflict between sections 107 and 145 of Cr. P.C. The words in S.145 are mandatory, while the language of S.107 is discretionary.

A) Balajit Singh v. Bhoju Ghose (1907) 35 Cal 117.
B) Shama Charan Chakravarti v. Katu Mundal (1897) 24 Cal 344.
C) Kali Kissen Tagore v. Anund Chunder Roy (1896) 23 Cal557
D) C. Nayak v State of orissa (1992) cr.L.J. 2188 ori