According to Ayn Rand, When Would It Be Morally Acceptable

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is According to Ayn Rand, it would be morally acceptable to save a drowning person if the act of saving them aligns with your own rational self-interest. In other words, if saving the person does not pose a significant risk to your own life or well-being, and if you genuinely value the life of the person in danger, then it would be morally acceptable to intervene and save them.

Ayn Rand's philosophy of Objectivism emphasizes the importance of rational self-interest and individual rights. In this context, saving a drowning person can be seen as an act of rational self-interest if it aligns with one's values and does not impose an unreasonable burden on oneself. However, if the act of saving the person would pose a significant risk to one's own life or well-being, then it may not be morally acceptable according to Rand's philosophy.

It's important to note that this perspective may be controversial and may not align with other ethical frameworks that prioritize altruism and self-sacrifice. Ultimately, the decision to save a drowning person should be based on a careful consideration of the potential risks and benefits, as well as one's own values and principles.

According to Ayn Rand, When Would It Be Morally Acceptable

Essay

Correct Answer:
Answered by ExamLex AI

According to Ayn Rand, When Would It Be Morally Acceptable

Essay

Correct Answer:Answered by ExamLex AIShow Answer

Correct Answer:
Answered by ExamLex AI