Multiple Choice
At an after work networking event, Mike drinks wine while negotiating the terms of an employment contract with Cyndy to start the next day. Cyndy shows up to work the next day and Mike states that he was drunk the night before and therefore lacked capacity. The court will most likely rule
A) Any time a contract is entered into with alcohol, no matter the amount, the person drinking lacks capacity.
B) The contract is voidable by Cyndy if she believed Mike was drunk.
C) The contract is voidable by Mike if he can prove that at the time he entered into the contract his intoxication prevented him from understanding the consequences of his actions.
D) The contract is void because Cyndy had an affirmative obligation to stop the negotiations.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q39: The ability to understand the terms of
Q40: In C.M.D. v. Facebook, the court determined
Q41: According to the contract laws of capacity,
Q42: Explain the difference between bright-line tests and
Q43: Capacity is the ability to make reasoned
Q44: When a person lacks capacity, generally those
Q45: If U.S. House Representative Jones agrees to
Q46: Hailey purchased an automobile insurance policy through
Q48: Open-ended standards of determining capacity are more
Q49: Illegal contracts are<br>A) Void<br>B) Voidable<br>C) Unjust<br>D) A