Solved

In Brandenburg V

Question 36

Multiple Choice

In Brandenburg v. Ohio, according to the First Amendment, freedom of speech, the court ruled that inflammatory speech or hate speech

A) Is not protected
B) Is protected
C) Is protected unless it seeks to imminently incite lawless actions
D) Is not protected if someone is offended

Related Questions

Q31: Another term for "the exclusionary rule" is A)

Q32: Does due process protections apply to corporation? A)

Q33: The police, while patrolling a neighborhood, observe

Q34: New Mexico passed a law banning private

Q35: When the federal government exercises its power

Q37: The theory behind the system of checks

Q38: Which statement is correct? A) The Constitution has

Q39: Marbury v. Madison A) Extended the Bill of

Q40: Which theory of constitutional interpretation asserts that

Q41: Ex post facto laws A) Are unconstitutional B) Are