In Waddell V. Rustin, the Court Determined

Multiple Choice

In Waddell v. Rustin, the court determined

A) That no implied partnership existed as that the prosperity of the business was not due to the equal contribution of the two parties.
B) An implied partnership did occur because the reasonable person would assume two brothers would be partners.
C) An express partnership existed because one man acknowledged that the other man did provide a valuable service for his business.
D) The business was not a partnership because all partnerships must have some written agreement to be considered a partnership.