In Danco, Inc

Multiple Choice

In Danco, Inc. v. Commerce Bank/Shore, 675 A.2d 663 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1996) , the court held that:

A) the indorsements of Danco were not required on the checks in question
B) the promises of Danco were not required on the checks in question
C) the indorsements of Commerce Bank were not required on the checks in question
D) the promises of Commerce Bank were not required on the checks in question