Multiple Choice
MATCHING
-Stop and frisk
A) Evidence that will change or evaporate in a manner that will destroy its evidentiary value.
B) An exception to the warrant to search requirement which says that consent to enter given to an undercover police officer or informant transfers to others in the police force who may then enter without a warrant.
C) The act of admitting guilt to a crime.
D) The 'fruit of the poisonous tree' doctrine that prohibits the admission of evidence obtained illegally at a defendant's criminal trial.
E) Situations that require urgent action, sufficient to excuse delay to get a warrant.
F) The act of giving testimony against one's penal interest.
G) The right not to testify against their own interests when accused of a crime.
H) Police officers may briefly stop, identify, and frisk persons reasonably believed to have committed a crime during the course of an investigation.
I) Money or other guarantee posted to assure a defendant who is released form custody pending trial or appeal will appear when called or forfeit the security posted.
J) A presumption that can be overcome by presenting evidence to the contrary
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q52: MATCHING<br>-Bail<br>A) Evidence that will change or evaporate
Q53: The rule that a person can only
Q54: Explain the exclusionary rule and give examples
Q55: A crime that punishes a person for
Q56: Which of the following examples would be
Q57: Which of the following is an example
Q58: It is possible for an act to
Q59: MATCHING<br>-Self-incrimination<br>A) Evidence that will change or evaporate
Q61: Double Jeopardy is:<br>A) prohibited by the Third
Q62: To obtain a search warrant, police must