Multiple Choice
MATCHING
-Exclusionary rule
A) Evidence that will change or evaporate in a manner that will destroy its evidentiary value.
B) An exception to the warrant to search requirement which says that consent to enter given to an undercover police officer or informant transfers to others in the police force who may then enter without a warrant.
C) The act of admitting guilt to a crime.
D) The 'fruit of the poisonous tree' doctrine that prohibits the admission of evidence obtained illegally at a defendant's criminal trial.
E) Situations that require urgent action, sufficient to excuse delay to get a warrant.
F) The act of giving testimony against one's penal interest.
G) The right not to testify against their own interests when accused of a crime.
H) Police officers may briefly stop, identify, and frisk persons reasonably believed to have committed a crime during the course of an investigation.
I) Money or other guarantee posted to assure a defendant who is released form custody pending trial or appeal will appear when called or forfeit the security posted.
J) A presumption that can be overcome by presenting evidence to the contrary
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q27: The act of admitting guilt or complicity
Q28: A person can be tried for the
Q29: The consent once removed doctrine means that
Q30: A hearing preparatory to admitting a confession
Q31: Define ex post facto law and explain
Q33: "Stop and frisk" searches are unconstitutional because
Q34: The Constitutional right to not testify against
Q35: MATCHING<br>-Right to Remain Silent<br>A) Evidence that will
Q36: Select the option below that does NOT
Q37: Which of the following searches does not