Solved

At Common Law, Evidence Had to Be Both Relevant and Material

Question 7

True/False

At common law, evidence had to be both relevant and material to be admissible in court. It had to tend to prove or disprove a fact for which it is being offered, and it had to be material to the fact at issue. Each was a separate concept.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Q2: Rule 403, present in most state rules,

Q3: The term material remains and the term

Q4: The Constitution may not limit or exclude

Q5: This holds that where there is any

Q6: Probative means that the evidence tends to

Q8: Even when relevant, evidence may still be

Q9: This legal test weighs probative value of

Q10: This case shows how evidence of mathematical

Q11: In this Supreme Court case, the issue

Q12: In order to satisfy the relevance requirement,