Solved

Regression Output for a Model That Omits Town as a Predictor

Question 3

Essay

Regression output for a model that omits Town as a predictor is provided. Assuming that the residuals for this reduced model do not indicate any problems with using multiple regression, is this model an improvement over the model that uses Size, Age, and Town as predictors? Statistically justify your answer by discussing at least two quantitative criteria.
The regression equation is
Price (in thousands) = 70.6 + 0.0624 Size (sq. ft.) - 0.635 Age
Regression output for a model that omits Town as a predictor is provided. Assuming that the residuals for this reduced model do not indicate any problems with using multiple regression, is this model an improvement over the model that uses Size, Age, and Town as predictors? Statistically justify your answer by discussing at least two quantitative criteria. The regression equation is Price (in thousands) = 70.6 + 0.0624 Size (sq. ft.) - 0.635 Age     S = 39.6368 R-Sq = 59.3% R-Sq(adj) = 57.5% Analysis of Variance
S = 39.6368 R-Sq = 59.3% R-Sq(adj) = 57.5%
Analysis of Variance
Regression output for a model that omits Town as a predictor is provided. Assuming that the residuals for this reduced model do not indicate any problems with using multiple regression, is this model an improvement over the model that uses Size, Age, and Town as predictors? Statistically justify your answer by discussing at least two quantitative criteria. The regression equation is Price (in thousands) = 70.6 + 0.0624 Size (sq. ft.) - 0.635 Age     S = 39.6368 R-Sq = 59.3% R-Sq(adj) = 57.5% Analysis of Variance

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Related Questions