Multiple Choice
An employee working for a firm has a significant amount of personal debt due to a recent real estate purchase. Which of the following statements is correct regarding whether this employee could be considered under duress?
A) The employee could be considered to be under duress, as the extra debt is likely to be very stressful and may affect decision making at work.
B) The employee cannot be considered to be under duress, as the employee voluntarily entered into the agreement that incurred the extra debt.
C) The employee could be considered as being under duress because the employee has an increased need for the job in order to keep the house payments current.
D) The employee cannot be considered as being under duress as the employee is free to quit the job at any time.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: How does the case of WeWork provide
Q3: The third domain of human action was
Q4: Which of the following represents part of
Q5: The integrated approach to business ethics described
Q6: Which of the following is the main
Q8: Supporting a Return to the Credo<br>In the
Q9: A transactional approach to business ethics focuses
Q10: Comparing the Corporate Credo of Johnson &
Q11: One of the main ethical issues identified
Q12: Which of the following was one of