Multiple Choice
Which statement about a Franks hearing is true?
A) The purpose of the hearing is to allow a criminal defendant to challenge the veracity of an affidavit used by the police to obtain a search warrant.
B) A simple allegation of falsity and/or material omission is insufficient to trigger (initiate) a Franks hearing.
C) The defendant bears the burden of proving, beyond a reasonable doubt, that an application for a warrant contained false statements that were knowingly or recklessly made, or alternatively that material information was knowingly or recklessly omitted from the warrant application.
D) All criminal suspects are entitled to a Franks hearing.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q27: Legal issues surrounding search and seizures typically
Q28: In a situation where an officer acts
Q29: What were all-purpose warrants referred to in
Q30: Proper execution of an anticipatory search warrant
Q31: To avoid the severity of total repression
Q33: A search warrant based on an affidavit
Q34: A general warrant _.<br>A) lacks specificity in
Q35: The execution of a search warrant must
Q36: Under rule 41(c) of the Federal Rules
Q37: Outline the process of applying for a