Multiple Choice
In a bivariate table, Cramer's V is 0.21 and lambda is 0. Which of the following should be our conclusion?
A) that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected; we have no evidence of an association
B) that the null hypothesis should be rejected, but we may have made a computation error when calculating lambda
C) that although V suggests a moderate relationship, lambda corrects our interpretation to indicate there is no relationship
D) that the variables may be associated even if lambda is zero, and disregard lambda if the row marginals are very unequal
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: For which of the following would phi
Q2: What is the major difference between Cramer's
Q3: <img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TB10833/.jpg" alt=" -Refer to the
Q4: Which of the following best describes how
Q5: <img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TB10833/.jpg" alt=" -Refer to the
Q7: If the independent (X) variable is located
Q8: What must be calculated before phi and
Q9: A researcher is interested in the association
Q10: Describe the difference between the "dependent-only prediction
Q11: Why are measures of association helpful in