Multiple Choice
Police detectives begin to interrogate a criminal suspect without having read the Miranda warnings. During this initial questioning, the suspect makes an incriminating statement. The detectives, after hearing the incriminating statement, make the suspect aware of his Miranda rights. Questioning continues and the suspect repeats the incriminating information. How are the courts most likely to view the statement?
A) The incriminating statement is inadmissible.
B) The incriminating statement is admissible, but any derivative evidence that can be gathered from the information in the statement is inadmissible.
C) The incriminating statement is inadmissible, but any derivative evidence that can be gathered from the information in the statement is admissible.
D) The incriminating statement is admissible, as is any derivative evidence that can be gathered from the information in the statement.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q19: A criminal suspect is arrested and subsequently
Q20: The essential ingredient which must be present
Q21: _ occurs when state officials create "a
Q22: Failure to comply with Miranda requirements _.<br>A)
Q23: Which statement is true?<br>A) In all situations
Q25: The term _ means an interrogation of
Q26: To have a valid waiver of a
Q27: What conditions must be present to trigger
Q28: In which situation would the suspect be
Q29: What "test" is used to determine if