Multiple Choice
If the treatment is a two-level within-subjects factor and counterbalancing is the between-subjects factor, a significant interaction between treatment and counterbalancing tells you
A) very little
B) that a between-subjects design should have been used instead
C) that subjects getting one sequence of treatments (A-B) had a different total score than subjects getting another sequence (B-A)
D) that subjects tended to score differently on their first trial than they did on their second trial
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q27: Order is a within subjects factor.
Q28: The difference between a within-subjects and a
Q29: If we want to know whether participants
Q30: You wish to evaluate the effects of
Q31: The matched pairs design should be analyzed
Q33: Relative to a pure within-subjects design, a
Q34: Which design would have the least power?<br>A)
Q35: Order effects are the same thing as
Q36: Twenty participants are studied in a simple
Q37: Counterbalanced designs permit you to assess both