Multiple Choice
If the treatment is a two-level within-subjects factor and counterbalancing is the between-subjects factor, a significant counterbalancing main effect tells you
A) very little
B) that a between subjects design should have been used instead
C) that subjects getting one sequence of treatments (A-B) had a different total score than subjects getting another sequence (B-A)
D) that subjects tended to score differently on their first trial than they did on their second trial
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: Because matched-pairs designs also use random assignment,
Q10: The within-subjects design has more power than
Q11: A counterbalanced design is one form of
Q12: If you cannot study many participants and
Q13: Counterbalanced designs require more participants than pure
Q15: Which design would be least likely to
Q16: Lengthening the time between trials should reduce<br>A)
Q17: Matching is desirable only when some uncontrolled
Q18: In the counterbalanced design, participants are randomly
Q19: If matching is based on an irrelevant