Multiple Choice
A study on the use of seat belts versus belted booster seats for children ages 4 and 5 reported that "Using seat belts instead of booster seats was associated with increased risk for serious injury in an accident; the relative risk was 2.4."Based on this, it can be concluded that for this study:
A) Children ages 4 and 5 in a booster seat were 2.4 times more likely to have serious injuries in an accident than were children wearing seatbelts.
B) Children ages 4 and 5 wearing seatbelts were 2.4 times more likely to have serious injuries in an accident than were children in a booster seat.
C) The percent of children ages 4 and 5 in a booster seat was 2.4 times higher than the percent of children wearing seatbelts.
D) The percent of children ages 4 and 5 wearing seatbelts was 2.4 times higher than the percent of children in a booster seat.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q39: Use the following information for questions:<br>The table
Q40: Use the following information for questions:<br>In a
Q41: The relative risk of a disease for
Q42: Explain in your own words or through
Q43: Pick the choice that best completes the
Q45: The statistical significance of the association or
Q46: Use the following information for questions:<br>The table
Q47: Use the following information for questions:<br>Students in
Q48: Use the following information for questions:<br> The
Q49: The relative risk of allergies for children