Multiple Choice
The following is from Environmental Compliance in U.S. Agricultural Policy: Past Performance and Future Potential, by Roger Claassen, Vince Breneman, Shawn Bucholtz, Andrea Cattaneo, Robert Johansson, and Mitch Morehart, AER-832, USDA/ERS, June 2004.
Since its inception in the 1930s, U.S. agricultural policy has been designed to support farmers' incomes while promoting soil conservation practices. By the 1970s, however, policymakers recognized that existing farm price and income support programs were not always consistent with soil conservation efforts. An unintended effect of these programs was to encourage producers to maintain or expand production of relatively erosive crops, such as row crops (corn, cotton, soybeans) , sometimes on highly erosion-prone soils. At the same time, the Government was helping farmers reduce soil erosion and related damages through conservation cost-sharing programs. Policymakers further recognized-aside from concerns about consistency-that farm program payments could be used as incentives to encourage better conservation behavior.
-Slope of the land surface:
A) Keep soil covered
B) Contour plowing
C) Provide shelter for fields
D) Return organic matter to soil
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q14: <img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TB10899/.jpg" alt=" -Complete the following
Q15: What combination of conservation techniques will best
Q16: Soils renew at a rate that is
Q17: Which scenario would result in the most
Q18: Porosity describes how rapidly water moves through
Q20: Regolith is essentially the same as soil.
Q21: <img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TB10899/.jpg" alt=" -Complete the following
Q22: The following is from Environmental Compliance in
Q23: The following is from Environmental Compliance in
Q24: The following is from Environmental Compliance in