Hardwig Argues That in Some Cases We Have a Duty

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Hardwig's argument that in some cases we have a duty to die may strike some people as repugnant because it goes against the instinctual human desire to preserve life at all costs. It challenges the deeply ingrained belief that we should do everything in our power to prolong our lives and the lives of others. The idea of actively choosing to die goes against our natural survival instincts and can be seen as morally objectionable.

However, the fact that this suggestion elicits repugnance is not sufficient to warrant the rejection of his thesis. Just because an idea is repugnant or goes against our initial instincts does not necessarily mean it is invalid. Hardwig's argument may provoke discomfort and challenge our deeply held beliefs, but that does not automatically make it untrue or unworthy of consideration. It is important to engage with difficult and uncomfortable ideas in order to fully understand and evaluate them.

Ultimately, whether or not we have a duty to die in certain circumstances is a complex ethical question that requires careful consideration and debate. While it may be initially repugnant to some, it is important to critically examine Hardwig's argument and consider the broader implications of his thesis before dismissing it outright.

Hardwig Argues That in Some Cases We Have a Duty

Essay

Correct Answer:
Answered by ExamLex AI

Hardwig Argues That in Some Cases We Have a Duty

Essay

Correct Answer:Answered by ExamLex AIShow Answer

Correct Answer:
Answered by ExamLex AI