Multiple Choice
Which of the following cases set out the factors to be considered in determining quantum of appropriate notice on termination of employment as endorsed by the Supreme Court of Canada?
A) Dowling v. Halifax (City of) [1998] S.C.R. 22
B) Cronk v. Canadian General Insurance (1994) , 19 O.R. (3d) 515 (Gen Div.)
C) Machinger v. HOJ Industries Ltd. [1992] 1 S.C.R. 986
D) Bardal v. Globe & Mail Ltd. (1960) 24 D.L.R. (2d) 140 (Ont. H.C.)
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: In circumstances involving the termination of an
Q8: With respect to punitive damages,what is meant
Q14: The case of Dowling v.Halifax (City of),[1998]
Q35: Identify the changes that are considered to
Q46: Employment standards legislation typically provides that an
Q49: Bad faith on the part of an
Q52: Which of the following would be included
Q57: What does the duty to mitigate require
Q62: What are the primary factors that tend
Q64: Discuss the ramifications of failing to mitigate