In His Decision in the Case of a 55-Year-Old Clerical

Multiple Choice

In his decision in the case of a 55-year-old clerical worker with 35 years' experience, Mr. Justice McPherson's award of 20 months' reasonable notice on termination was viewed as a signal of the judiciary's willingness to re-examine the notice factors. That view became nebulous upon the Court of Appeal reducing the award to 12 months on appeal. Which of the following is a valid severe criticism of the Court of Appeal's decision in this matter?

A) It is repugnant to modern, contemporary Canadian social values.
B) An inappropriate weight should not be given to the character of employment.
C) All factors used to determine reasonable notice are to be appropriately weighted.
D) It is obvious that enforcing employee rights is repugnant to Canada's judiciary.