Multiple Choice
Mr. Holden, a program developer, developed software for inventory control that was superior to others on the market. He launched an ad campaign and all went well for several months-until a competitor came out with a cheaper program. In time, he could not pay his debts when they became due and owing. A supplier sued for damages and was awarded judgment for $21,000. Holden did not pay. With regard to the supplier's position at this time, which of the following is False?
A) Since the decision is in his favour, the supplier would be a judgment creditor, Holden, a judgment debtor.
B) The supplier could have a garnishee order served on Holden's bank, ordering the bank to pay money into court instead of to Holden.
C) The supplier could examine Holden under oath about his assets and sources of income.
D) The supplier could obtain a writ of execution that directs a court official to seize Holden and detain him in court until he arranges payment.
E) The supplier could get a government-authorized official to seize and sell enough of Holden's property to satisfy the debt.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q16: Generally, when a cause of action arises
Q41: In which of the following situations would
Q99: When a cause of action arises in
Q126: Discuss the restrictions on the power of
Q141: Distinguish between the executive and legislative branches
Q142: What is the standard of proof used
Q148: Hao wants to negotiate a settlement but
Q154: Judicial review is an appeal of the
Q167: The Supreme Court of Canada only hears
Q204: Explain the function and jurisdiction of the