Multiple Choice
Joe was in a bar and saw his friend Sam. Sam had had a considerable amount to drink. Sam offered to sell Joe his Porsche automobile for only $15,000. Joe made sure to have Sam sign a written agreement to that effect. The next day, Joe went to pick up the car, but Sam didn't remember anything about it. Even when Joe showed him the written agreement signed by him, Sam refused to deliver the car. Joe sued. Which of the following correctly states the legal position of the parties?
A) If Joe can show that there was no indication that Sam was drunk, even though Sam was completely incapacitated, he will be required to go through with the deal.
B) Sam just has to show he was legally intoxicated, and he will not be bound.
C) As long as Joe can produce the agreement in writing, there is nothing Sam can do to get out of the deal. Once Sam has signed the document, he is responsible for its contents.
D) Sam will not have to go through with the deal because no money has yet changed hands.
E) Being drunk is no excuse and the contract is binding.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q141: Which of the following statements correctly illustrates
Q142: Smith ran a software design business. He
Q143: What must a person establish in order
Q144: A(n) _ describes a relationship in which
Q145: If a third party incurs a secondary
Q147: In Royal Bank of Canada v. Holoboff,
Q148: All contracts must be written to be
Q149: A provision that restricts the seller from
Q150: "A person's intention to be bound by
Q151: Describe three situations in your jurisdiction where