Multiple Choice
On the February 1, Smyth contracted to buy Dupont's van. They had agreed that Smyth would pay the price of $7000 on March 1 and take delivery and the risk on that date. Smyth then contracted to sell the van to Smithers on March 5 for $7600. On February 22, Dupont called Smyth and said he wasn't going to sell because he had decided to keep the van. On these facts, which of the following is False?
A) Dupont's call is an express repudiation of the contract and is an anticipatory breach.
B) Smyth could agree to call off the contract; neither of them had yet performed.
C) Smyth could refuse to acknowledge a breach, but that would result in the possibility that the contract could be breached later.
D) Smyth could acknowledge that Dupont was in breach but has to wait until after the performance date to sue him for breach of contract.
E) Smyth could refuse to acknowledge a breach and press Dupont to complete the contact.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: In which of the following situations would
Q9: Indicate three conditions under which a contract
Q34: A breach of warranty allows a victim
Q45: In which one of the following instances
Q63: Explain how the remedy of damages is
Q94: Perfect Programs Ltd. hired Gill, who had
Q105: If a contractor has agreed to build
Q118: Which of the following is False with
Q143: Which of the following is true with
Q147: Which of the following would most likely