Multiple Choice
Economists have long debated whether there is a significant loss of well-being to society in markets that are monopolistically competitive rather than perfectly competitive.Which of the following offers the best reason why some economists believe that monopolistically competitive markets are less efficient than perfectly competitive markets?
A) In contrast to perfectly competitive markets, neither allocative efficiency nor productive efficiency are achieved in monopolistically competitive markets.
B) In contrast to perfectly competitive markets, firms in monopolistically competitive markets earn economic profits in long-run equilibrium.
C) In contrast to perfectly competitive markets, firms in monopolistically competitive markets do not produce where price equals average total cost in long-run equilibrium.
D) In contrast to perfectly competitive markets, firms in monopolistically competitive markets can charge a price greater than average total cost in the short run.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q218: In both monopolistically competitive and perfectly competitive
Q219: Suppose that if a local McDonald's restaurant
Q220: Figure 13-4<br> <img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TB4193/.jpg" alt="Figure 13-4
Q221: Figure 13-6<br> <img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TB4193/.jpg" alt="Figure 13-6
Q222: Assume that price exceeds average variable cost
Q224: Compared to a perfectly competitive firm, the
Q225: A monopolistically competitive firm earning profits in
Q226: One of your classmates asserts that advertising,
Q227: Why would an organization as large as
Q228: A firm that successfully differentiates its product