Multiple Choice
For years, economists believed that market structure explained the ability of some firms to earn economic profits.For example, firms in industries with little competition and high barriers to entry would earn higher profits than firms in competitive industries with low entry barriers.Which of the following has caused economists to question this explanation and seek other explanations for why firms are profitable?
A) Studies have shown that, on average, firms in competitive industries earn higher profit rates than firms in industries with little competition.
B) In recent years, new technologies have increased the potential entry of new firms in industries with high entry barriers.
C) Studies have shown that firms in industries that have little competition and high entry barriers are not very profitable. Economists conclude from this that some competition is necessary in order to force firms to lower their costs and develop products that satisfy new consumer demands.
D) The market structure explanation fails to explain how firms in the same industry can have very different levels of profit.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q161: A sequential game can be used to
Q162: Suppose we want to use game theory
Q163: Each member of OPEC can increase its
Q164: Because many business situations are repeated games,
Q165: A patent is an example of<br>A)how ownership
Q167: For many years the Aluminum Company of
Q168: A patent is a government-imposed entry barrier
Q169: An example of a government-imposed barrier to
Q170: Table 14-2<br> <img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TB4193/.jpg" alt="Table 14-2
Q171: Table 14-1<br> <img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TB4193/.jpg" alt="Table 14-1