Multiple Choice
Vicki entered into a written contract to buy a car from Valley Motors.During the negotiations,the sales representative said that the car had a two-year full warranty.The written contract included a provision that stated,"This writing is the full and final expression of the parties' agreement; anything said before signing or while signing is irrelevant." The written contract did not include a warranty.Two months after Vicki took delivery of the car,she discovered that the transmission needed to be replaced.Vicki claimed that it was covered by the full warranty.Will Vicki be able to present evidence as to the sales representative's statements concerning the warranty?
A) No.The parole evidence rule will most likely exclude any evidence of the discussion of the warranty.
B) Yes.The leading object rule will allow evidence as to the discussion of the warranty.
C) Yes.The evidence is needed because the contract is ambiguous.
D) Yes.The contract was fully executed.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q6: parole evidence refers to anything (other than
Q7: Hannah orally agrees to sell her house
Q10: Derek and Abyan were discussing business over
Q12: Jennifer has been wanting to purchase Wayne's
Q13: Scott is trying to introduce oral evidence
Q14: Alice is president and sole shareholder of
Q15: Robin and Bellman,both merchants,orally agree to a
Q17: J.T.Tidwell entered into an oral contract with
Q35: Thomas Reep,was the president of First National
Q42: Bry,Inc.and Gangl Co.entered into an oral agreement