In the Case Rosenberg V.Son,Inc.,the Court Held That

Multiple Choice

In the case Rosenberg v.Son,Inc.,the Court held that:

A) Son, Inc., as the assignee, was liable to the Rosenbergs.
B) Despite the assignment of her rights, Pratt remained liable to the Rosenbergs.
C) The assignment became a novation because Rosenberg signed it.
D) The Rosenbergs became liable to Son, Inc.