Short Answer
General Theory
-a. If we interpret the sentence "All scientists are philosophers" so that it is correctly symbolized by 
, then why will "All scientists are philosophers" not imply "Some scientists are philosophers"?
b. If we interpret “All scientists are philosophers” so that it has existential import, then does “All scientists are philosophers” imply “Some scientists are philosophers” or not? (Defend your answer.)
Correct Answer:
Verified
a. Because when so interpreted, the trut...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q22: Multiple choice: <br>Assume existential import<br>-The proposition "Some
Q23: Multiple choice: <br>Assume existential import<br>-The proposition "All
Q24: True-False<br>-"All scientists are philosophers" and "No scientists
Q25: Inference: <br>Answer the following questions, not assuming
Q26: Syllogisms<br>Put the following into standard syllogistic form
Q27: Syllogisms<br>Put the following into standard syllogistic form
Q28: True-False<br>-The subject term of "Some scientists are
Q29: Sorites. <br>Translate the following sorites into
Q31: Syllogisms<br>Put the following into standard syllogistic form
Q32: Inference: <br>Answer the following questions, not assuming