Multiple Choice
Martin wins a car in a lottery. As he already owns a car, he decides to sell the new one to his friend Ted. While driving the car, Ted gets into a head-on collision with another car. Due to a defective Supplemental Restraint System (SRS) in the vehicle, the airbag does not deploy and Ted is seriously injured. Which of the following statements is true of this situation?
A) Martin can be held strictly liable because he sold the car to Ted.
B) The car manufacturer cannot be held strictly liable as Ted had not bought the car from it.
C) Martin cannot be held strictly liable as the sale of the car counts as a casual transaction.
D) The driver of the other car can be held strictly liable due to his or her involvement in the accident.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q63: Manufacturers and sellers are strictly liable for
Q64: Companies that manufacture products according to government
Q65: In a negligence lawsuit, parties who were
Q66: Bertha, a surgeon, performed a kidney transplant
Q67: The doctrine of strict liability holds the
Q69: Bartie's Inc. sells watercolors and pastels that
Q70: A risk-utility analysis requires showing that a
Q71: John was driving his friend, Mary, back
Q72: _ is a tort related to defective
Q73: Manufacturers and sellers have a duty to