Essay
Bondi Shipping Corp steered its ship, The Surf, into a dock that was owned by Bradman Inc.Bondi intended to make certain repairs to The Surf.During the course of those repairs, Bondi's employees carelessly allowed a chemical, known as australite, to leak into the water surrounding the dock.The australite, which floated on the surface of the water, caught fire after sparks from a welding gun that Bondi's employees were using fell into the water and onto the australite.The flames spread quickly and Bradman's dock was entirely destroyed.The total cost of the damage is $2 million.The court has found that Bondi is vicariously responsible for the actions of its employees, and that those employees committed the tort of negligence when they carelessly allowed australite to leak out of The Surf and onto the water.The court also found that while it is now obvious that australite is flammable in some circumstances, no one knew (or could have known) at the time of the accident that australite is flammable.Will Bondi be held liable to Bradman for compensatory damages? Provide the best explanation for your answer.
Correct Answer:

Verified
The facts of this question are based on ...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q56: Bentham Inc sued Locke Ltd in tort.The
Q57: Christine entered into a contract with Vernon.She
Q58: A tort is considered to be actionable
Q59: According to one old English case, Ethelred
Q60: Werner owns a number of animals that
Q62: You have been hired by a law
Q63: Ramon cut the grass that surrounded a
Q64: Celine physically attacked Roger.She therefore committed both
Q65: Damages in tort look backward, whereas damages
Q66: Robert successfully sued Marjorie in tort.Majorie has