Multiple Choice
Chloe sued Vincent for negligence.He has relied on the defence of contributory negligence.That defence may be successful only if the evidence proves that
A) it was reasonably foreseeable that a careless act by Chloe might inflict a loss upon Vincent.
B) Chloe actually knew that she might injure herself if she acted carelessly.
C) Chloe's carelessness created one injury and Vincent's carelessness caused a different injury.
D) Chloe failed to act like a reasonable person would have acted in her circumstances.
E) Chloe and Vincent cooperated in creating the actual accident that injured Chloe.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q38: Which of the following statements is TRUE
Q39: Which of the following statements most accurately
Q40: Thalia has sued Pi Inc for negligence.The
Q41: Zoe was injured last New Year's Eve
Q42: Nelson has sued Shaniqua under the tort
Q44: The concept of remoteness<br>A)arises for consideration under
Q45: Tyrek has sued Cassandra for negligence.The only
Q46: The thin skull doctrine applies to the
Q47: Which of the following statements is TRUE
Q48: Shamar works as a financial adviser.He was