Multiple Choice
Laetitia agreed to provide certain services to Hans in exchange for a payment of $10 000.Although Laetitia fully performed her side of the agreement, Hans refuses to pay anything.He insists that Laetitia does not have a right to sue for breach of contract because, in performing the services, she was merely doing something that she had become obliged to do even before she entered into her agreement with Hans.Hans's position is correct if Laetitia's pre-existing obligation was
A) some type of public duty.
B) supported by a seal rather than by consideration.
C) a private obligation owed to a third party.
D) for some reason unenforceable.
E) subject to a quantum meruit.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: The doctrine of promissory estoppel operates only
Q2: In late May, Lovin was excited about
Q4: Which of the following propositions is TRUE
Q5: "The law of contract assumes that people
Q6: Which of the following situations involves the
Q7: Epsilon Inc and Delta Ltd entered into
Q8: Which of the following statements is TRUE?<br>A)A
Q9: Which of the following statements is TRUE?<br>A)Under
Q10: Canadian courts consistently hold that a promise
Q11: ABC Construction agreed to build a pool