Multiple Choice
Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A) The doctrine of promissory estoppel can be used to create a new contract between parties who do not have any pre-existing relationship.
B) The decision in London Drugs Ltd v Kuehne & Nagel International Ltd requires proof that the relevant contractual clause expressly refers to the employee.
C) The decision in Central London Property Ltd v High Trees House Ltd created a new equitable doctrine that allows for the enforcement of some gratuitous promises.
D) The decision in Pao On v Lau Yiu Long stands for the proposition that a contract may exist if a person gives an implied promise to pay when requesting the provision of goods or services.
E) An equitable assignment is possibly only if the parties created a contract that is valid in equity, but not in law.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q65: Sid and Nancy entered into a contract.Sid
Q66: Under the Electronic Home Business Administration Act,
Q67: Identify and explain two situations in which
Q68: Gareth recently graduated with the highest GPA
Q69: A gratuitous promise is generally not enforceable.
Q70: The contractual rule that requires an exchange
Q72: Which of the following best explains why
Q73: Under a contract of carriage, Bravo Shipping
Q74: JB Inc sold a piece of equipment
Q75: Tracey is a police officer.While she was