Multiple Choice
Preetpal purchased a ticket to ride on a train from Toronto to Ottawa.After she had boarded the train, she was asked if she wished to place her outerwear and backpack into a storage unit on the train.Because she did not want to be encumbered during her journey, she accepted the offer.She was given a "small baggage claims" ticket before handing over her coat and belongings.When the train arrived in Ottawa, and Preetpal tried to collect her coat, she was told that it could not be found.When she threatened to sue, the person who was representing the train told Preetpal that the back of the "small baggage claims" ticket that she received contained a term that excluded liability for lost or stolen goods.Assuming these are the only exclusions, Preetpal can be bound by the exclusion clause only if
A) she actually read it.
B) it was written in a font that was larger than the font that otherwise appeared on the ticket.
C) the clause was written in a language that she can read.
D) it was explained to her when she first bought her train ticket.
E) she was given reasonable notice of the terms on the back of the ticket before or at the time that she received the ticket.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q4: An exception to the parol evidence rule
Q5: A pre-contractual representation<br>A)creates a legally enforceable obligation.<br>B)is
Q6: Denise is a farmer in Prince Edward
Q7: Why do insurance contracts require a duty
Q8: Which of the following statements regarding boilerplate
Q10: Restitution is always possible for any misrepresentation
Q11: Asif purchased a business from Olga.During negotiations
Q12: Consumer protection laws in several jurisdictions including
Q13: Why are boilerplate provisions of potential value
Q14: Leilani purchased a business from Troy.She is