Multiple Choice
Lawrence and Jane were negotiating a contract, for the purchase and sale of widgets, over cocktails.Jane believed that Lawrence was completely intoxicated and she was hoping to take advantage of his condition to get the best possible deal for herself.Lawrence, however, knew what Jane was trying to do because he was really only slightly impaired.He therefore manipulated the situation to sign two contracts.The first was to his advantage and the second benefitted Jane.Lawrence believed that he would be entitled to enforce the first, but walk away from the second.Which of the following is most likely to be TRUE?
A) Both deals are enforceable because Lawrence was not truly incapacitated.
B) Neither deal is enforceable because Jane believed Lawrence to be intoxicated and therefore could not have reasonably expected to enforce either transaction.
C) A court will enforce the first contract, but not the second, because Jane tried to take advantage of Lawrence before he tried to take advantage of her.
D) A court will enforce the second contract, but not the first, because Lawrence knew the true facts, but Jane did not.
E) Neither contract is enforceable because even a person who pretends to be intoxicated does not have contractual capacity.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q17: Malkit sold a house to Amanda.The evidence
Q18: The form and content requirements of the
Q19: Unconscionable transactions can be characterized as one-sided
Q20: As part of a large multinational corporation,
Q21: Tinh agrees to purchase a block of
Q23: Across Canada, the age of majority is
Q24: In 1824, Justice Burrough said, "Public policy
Q25: The concept of capacity<br>A)means the legal power
Q26: Because she was moving to Calgary, Lucy
Q27: A minor's contract for necessaries of life