Essay
Pierette entered into a contract with Hugo.She agreed to deliver a shipment of gold to his jewellery store each week for a year.He agreed to pay a specific price.The contract also said: "The buyer shall have the right to terminate this contract in the event of a substantial change in the market price of gold." After delivering gold to Hugo for several months, Pierette refused to go on with the contract.Her decision to do so was based on the fact that while her contract with Hugo contained a specific price, the market value of gold had suddenly increased a substantial amount.Consequently, she realized that her contract with Hugo no longer made good financial sense from her perspective.Would a court accept that argument from Pierette? Explain your answer.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Pierette's argument would not be success...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q38: Briefly describe three ways in which a
Q39: The difference between a condition precedent and
Q40: Ichiro and Emily discussed the possibility that
Q41: Which of the following statements is TRUE
Q42: Pym had an idea for an invention.Campbell
Q44: Sasha owed $350 to Nicole.Under the terms
Q45: A homebuilder, Jim, accepts an entire contract
Q46: Corrie contractually agreed to build a house
Q47: Rande contractually agreed to purchase his electricity,
Q48: An accord and satisfaction is effective only